Home Up Feedback Contents Search







copy of same material in Climate Control under Global Warming

COOLING OR HEATING A PLANET BY USE OF RINGS       J.H.L.Lawler  1984  IJS Vol 4 page 33


It is possible either to cool or to heat a planet, or to redistribute the heat, cooling the equator while warming the poles, by use of rings of reflective material about the planet.  For example if a planet were to be too hot at the equator, that could be climatically altered by placing a fairly low orbit ring to block and reflect part of the isolation that would have struck the equator, thus radiating' it to space. and reducing the total heat input,  In the reverse case a ring placed so that it does not obstruct incoming light, but so that it does reflect some light from the ring to the planet that would not have Otherwise reached the planet can raise the temperature by  rather large amounts, up to double being easily obtained.


In the case of a low altitude ring the solid angle Subtended by the planet and by the open space are approximately equal, and thus half the reflected light would reach the planet, and half would he reflected away into space. Thus the heat gathering ability is far less than the heat rejection ability which can approach 95% of the incoming light. The ring can be set to reject selectively into space- with virtually none of the reflected light striking the planet, The planet thus is cooled to the extent of the shadowing or the area of the planet times the percent loss from the presence of the ring.

In trying to re-distribute the energy, The problem becomes more complex. In the most general case there are four distinct areas to be entered into the computation.

A1 the area of the planet which is somewhat altered but receives light directly:  A2 is the area of the rings which receives light and reflects it to the planet, which would not have directly received light without the rings: A3 is the area which receives light onto the rings which would have normally fallen onto the planet (the shadowed area) and  A4 is polar area which  is NOT shadowed in part  like A1   and is not altered at all except by the added  liqht from A2 and A3


        The total area of the planet is A1+ A3 +Aas seen from the primary (Sol). 

The light before the alteration would be    LIGHT  IN = (A1+ A3 +A4) n1

The energy afterward would be:

LIGHT IN =              A1n1 +A2 n2 + A3(l- n2/3 ) + A3 n3  + A4(n1 + n1/4 )



where the ns are a combination of the reflectivity and geometry (i.e. the fraction of the planetary surface that receives light from that area)- with the third term having been simplified by assumption that the reflected light half strikes the planet and half is rejected to space- which is not always true...i.e. that light which passes thru strikes the planet anyhow--that which Is reflected still some strikes the planet.

Because of the energy rejection that area Shadowed  (A1) is cooled to the extent of the loss by the shadowing area A3, and heated by the added light received from A2-note that the cooling is strongest at the equator which receives virtually no A2 light, and tapers to A4   which receives maximal benefit with no cooling and  much A2 enhancement.


International  Journal of Science  VOL 4 P 33


Let us examine a point on the equator.  It looses light by the ratio  of  A3R/2 to A1 since

the ring A 3 reflects, with R, light, but in a low orbit roughly half the light reflected

strikes the planet in any case.  The light not reflected passes on into the planet thru

the ring and is adsorbed to the normal extent of the albedo as if the ring were not there

        Only the reflected light is lost and Only half of that. However, the energy is increased to

         the extent of the light reflected from A4 (2 parts). Thus depending on the ratio of  A3  to

-        A2  the net gain could be positive energy or a net loss resulting in negative energy

          balance.  If the ring  crosses at 30 North and 30 South  latitude

          (note sine 30 = 0.5)     

         then the net energy balance at  the equator is zero change.  At higher angles the net

          effect will be cooling,  at lower the net effect  will be heating of the equatorial regions.

-         The polar areas (A) have no shadowing at all, and receive 's more light by the ratio of

         A2 /4  to  A4/2  plus A3 R/4 +to A4/2 

         (the pole itself sees only half of A2 and half the light  from A3   which is reflected (R)

           strikes the planet if the ring is  at low altitude with half the light escaping. At higher

          altitude a correction for the geometry must also be applied, further reducing the

          capture from both A2 and A3.   The portion of A3 away from

the poles is fairly compensated by added A2  area added or lost so the net is about

 uniform at the whole polar area A4. The fractional gain or fractional loss in A1  

depends upon latitude, but the effect at any latitude will be proportional to the

equatorial effect. The fractional effect then varies in the transitional zone from the

equatorial effect to the polar effect-linearly Across the transitional zone.  Thus the

energy input at any part of the planet, or the net resultant can be computed by simply

adding the three zones ( AA4 and A5). together. 

If  one wanted to cool the equatorial regions say 1% energy loss and add 2% to the

poles then  a Specific ring system is designated.  It is not possible to quite get

uniform global temperature in any real case.   A small planet with a huge ring would

approach this; however, the ring effect is such that it is possible to moderate any

planet~ to raise or  lower the  mean temperature up to equivalent of about 50%

energy either direction, and to shift about half the mean temperature extremes

between poles and equator out of the system with a realistic ring system. Any shift

past about the point where the ring  equals the diameter of the planet in cross

measurement would seem te be pushing the limits of practicality,


That however allows areas of 4 times the collection in the ring or double the energy to

the planet, so that more than doubles the "habitable zone in planetary systems from

 that which would be natural. This then allows terra-forming planets that require twice

the energy      -or half the energy (the square root of 2 in distance) of the optimal

distance, and with some allowance for not using all of the planet as  being either too

hot  or too cold, would allow a zone of about Venus to Mars roughly for acclimatizing

planets. Venus is on the marginally close end while Mars is well within the allowable

range Mars will be easier, but I have  little doubt that Venus may well be terra-formed

to provide mere living room in the near solar System (lebensraum).

These are well within the projected technology of the 21st century   and not in the

far distant realm of speculation,




Home ] Up ] Feedback ] Contents ] Search ]

Send mail to Jhlawr@wmconnect.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright 2002 The Nexial Institute